THEY're Always Watching
Comment(s) »
» Leave a comment
- Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
- Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
- The line and paragraph breaks automatically

Hey -
We've moved into a new stage - no rights and a dead constitution. A fraud usurper at the helm - banks looting the public - For all intents and purposes - America is no more.
I've said pretty much everything I have to say. If you still haven't figured out the truth - there's nothing I can do for ya. You're gonna figure it out for yourself soon enough. I have a wife and 4 kids and have to love and respect her enough not to put her in the position of this video. Since I have no more rights to protect me and my speech/views - I think the time has come to be quiet. I'm not a coward - but I don't want to be brave at someone elses expense. I receive many ominous threats through youtube - and she got wind of one the other day that scared the hell out of her. Anyway - My toutube channels and blogs are all down - besides this one.
I'll never surrender the fight against THEM - I'm just taking it into other efforts.
I'll be on here to post pictures and maybe some of my stories and to see what you guys are up to.
Parting shot - I told you it would come to this, Elmer.
Comment by The Dudeler— 2009/05/07 @ 09:28 AM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/05/07 @ 10:31 AM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/05/07 @ 10:33 AM — (Reply)
I've got them all burned to dvd - I should make a million of them and start leaving them everywhere.
Comment by The Dudeler— 2009/05/07 @ 11:02 AM — (Reply)
Hostile bloggers facing fines, jail?
A new proposal in Congress is threatening fines and jail time for what it calls "cyberbullying" – communications that include e-mails and text messages that "cause substantial emotional distress."
The vague generalities are included in H.R. 1966 by California Democrat Linda Sanchez and about a dozen co-sponsors.
But it already is being condemned as unconstitutional, unrealistic and probably ineffectual.
Read the latest now on WND.com.
Comment by The Dudeler— 2009/05/07 @ 11:28 AM — (Reply)
Comment by The Dudeler— 2009/05/07 @ 11:46 AM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/05/07 @ 12:36 PM — (Reply)
Comment by The Dudeler— 2009/05/07 @ 11:46 AM — (Reply)
there's time for the generalities to be made specific
Here's how the bill reads now:
Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Frankly I'm more concerned about my rights as a gun
owner.
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2009/05/07 @ 11:58 AM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/05/07 @ 12:32 PM — (Reply)
I can totally see it leading to someone posting, say - a blog about oBOMBa being a Kenyan usurper - That may lead to substantial emotional distress to one of his boot lickin supporters - who may feel your hostile for not agreeing with them... Free speech is dead.
Comment by The Dudeler— 2009/05/08 @ 09:13 AM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/05/08 @ 08:27 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2009/05/08 @ 09:54 PM — (Reply)
Comment by The Dudeler— 2009/05/08 @ 09:25 AM — (Reply)
I trust Him.
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2009/05/08 @ 11:40 AM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/05/08 @ 02:20 PM — (Reply)
Here's another headline sent to my email -
A Louisiana driver has been stopped and detained for having a "Don't Tread on Me" bumper sticker on his vehicle and warned by a police officer about the "subversive" message it sent.
Read the latest now on WND.com.
Comment by The Dudeler— 2009/05/08 @ 01:03 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2009/05/08 @ 01:13 PM — (Reply)
I'll be around to bust chops and leave my doodles now and again.
Comment by The Dudeler— 2009/05/08 @ 01:59 PM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/05/08 @ 02:07 PM — (Reply)